-advertisements-

COP15 and water...


- advertisements -
Spacer
Pollution
Pollution > Contaminated Soi Source of Mercury

Contaminated Soi Source of Mercury

  02/12/2009
Riverbank and floodplain soils are the major source of mercury in fish from several Shenandoah Valley rivers (USA). A new federal study shows that 96% of the mercury loads to the South River come from soil that was contaminated more than 50 years ago by a textile manufacturing plant in Waynesboro, VA, USA.

 

“Currently, about 416 pounds of mercury get into the South River per year. To meet safety standards in fish for human consumption, mercury loads to the South River cannot exceed 4 pounds per year. That’s a reduction of 99 percent,” said Jack Eggleston, a U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) hydrologist and author of the report.

“Now we know why fish continue to have elevated mercury and what reductions are needed to make the fish safe to eat again,” said Eggleston.


Mercury from the textile plant washed into the South River and subsequently contaminated the South Fork Shenandoah River, the Shenandoah River, and the floodplains along the three rivers. The textile plant, operated by DuPont, discharged mercury waste from 1929-1950.
Since 1977 the Commonwealth of Virginia has placed a fish consumption health advisory on 128 miles of river downstream of the plant. Safety standards set by the U.S. EPA are 0.3 parts per million of mercury in fish. High concentrations of mercury occur in fish because mercury accumulates throughout the lifetime of an organism. This bioaccumulation is magnified in organisms at higher levels in the food chain.

During the study, USGS scientists and partners from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VDEQ), and the U.S. EPA collected and analyzed hundreds of water and sediment samples. By using computer models, they simulated water, sediment and mercury movement in the South River watershed. The results of the study will be used by VDEQ to develop plans for cleaning up the rivers contaminated with mercury.

Help on the study also came from the South River Science Team, comprised of scientists from government agencies, universities, DuPont, environmental groups, and other stakeholders who have met regularly for the past 10 years. The team is co-sponsored by DuPont, which operated the plant, and the VDEQ. The South River Science Team provided a forum for sharing data and ideas to make the study more comprehensive.

 





Bookmark and Share

Read more about:  safety 
Supplier: United States Geological Survey (USGS)

More news from this supplier:
Drinking Water Wells Vulnerable to Contamination
Pesticide Levels Decline in Corn Belt Rivers
Atlanta Floods Extremely Rare
Key Role for Landsat in Water-use Maps
Record Floods in Georgia
USGS Track Cause Ground Sinking
Helping Understanding Changing Climate
Erosion Doubles Along Alaska's Arctic Coast
Man-Made Chemicals Found in Drinking Water at Low Levels
Flooding During Gustav Tracked Real-Time


Prepare Cities for Climate Change
Activated Sludge Process Call for Abstracts
Compact Range of Water Test Equipment
Siemens: Water Business to Grow Twice As The Market
Sex-Change Frogs
New DAF Nozzle Design
Sustainable Water and Waste Water Investments
UV-Tronic+ V5 PLC Controller
Smart Water for Green Schools
Denver Suburb to Use Geospatial Technology


     


Comments (0):
There are no comments yet.
Make your comment:
Name:
Your comment:
Type over the 2 words (or number) from the picture
 
Popular news Events Job ads
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
 

Interactive


Aerial Comparison of a Creek System

An aerial comparison of a multiple lake system, that reveals how groundwater recharge occurs in the basalt geology of the Columbia Basin in just two years time.

 
 
 
 Last 5 items:
 Aerial Comparison of a Creek System
 Integrated Rural Water Management in India
 Columbia Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade
 Hydrogenic City 2020 Project
 Antarctica Challenge: A Global Warning
 
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer